Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) considered the approval of a resolution plan by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), focusing on valuation processes and compliance with Section 29-A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant's claims of irregularities in valuation and alleged ban by SEBI on SRA's promoters were deemed unsubstantiated. The Tribunal emphasized that the Committee of Creditors' (CoC) decision to approve the plan, supported by 100% voting share, is a commercial decision not subject to judicial interference unless noncompliance with Section 30(2) of IBC is proven. The Adjudicating Authority's approval of the plan and rejection of the appellant's objections were upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) considered the approval of a resolution plan by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), focusing on valuation processes and compliance with Section 29-A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant's claims of irregularities in valuation and alleged ban by SEBI on SRA's promoters were deemed unsubstantiated. The Tribunal emphasized that the Committee of Creditors' (CoC) decision to approve the plan, supported by 100% voting share, is a commercial decision not subject to judicial interference unless noncompliance with Section 30(2) of IBC is proven. The Adjudicating Authority's approval of the plan and rejection of the appellant's objections were upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
