Interest on delayed release of requisitioned cash includes statutory pre-assessment interest and restitutionary compensation for unlawful post-assessm...
Incomplete inventory records justify rejecting accounts, while profit estimation requires relevant comparable material and interest falls under other ...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires functional alignment; delayed associated-enterprise receivables need separate LIBOR-based benchmarking, while ...
Extended reassessment limitation in search cases requires asset-linked escaped income, invalidating additions based only on unexplained money or expen...
Enhanced tolerance band under section 43CA applies retrospectively, deleting qualifying deemed-sale additions while disputed stamp valuation requires ...
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) considered the approval of a resolution plan by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), focusing on valuation processes and compliance with Section 29-A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant's claims of irregularities in valuation and alleged ban by SEBI on SRA's promoters were deemed unsubstantiated. The Tribunal emphasized that the Committee of Creditors' (CoC) decision to approve the plan, supported by 100% voting share, is a commercial decision not subject to judicial interference unless noncompliance with Section 30(2) of IBC is proven. The Adjudicating Authority's approval of the plan and rejection of the appellant's objections were upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) considered the approval of a resolution plan by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), focusing on valuation processes and compliance with Section 29-A(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appellant's claims of irregularities in valuation and alleged ban by SEBI on SRA's promoters were deemed unsubstantiated. The Tribunal emphasized that the Committee of Creditors' (CoC) decision to approve the plan, supported by 100% voting share, is a commercial decision not subject to judicial interference unless noncompliance with Section 30(2) of IBC is proven. The Adjudicating Authority's approval of the plan and rejection of the appellant's objections were upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4921 
