Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involves a query regarding the classification of goods and services for GST purposes. The applicant sought clarification on the consideration charged for supplying aggregates and recovering royalty charges. The ruling determined that the applicant's tax collection on royalty charges and goods supplied separately in invoices indicated distinct transactions. Royalty charges were classified under SAC 997337, attracting 9% CGST and 9% SGST, while aggregates fell under HSN code 251710, subject to CGST @2.5% and SGST @2.5%. The ruling emphasized the separate nature of the transactions, not constituting mixed or composite supply.
The case involves a query regarding the classification of goods and services for GST purposes. The applicant sought clarification on the consideration charged for supplying aggregates and recovering royalty charges. The ruling determined that the applicant's tax collection on royalty charges and goods supplied separately in invoices indicated distinct transactions. Royalty charges were classified under SAC 997337, attracting 9% CGST and 9% SGST, while aggregates fell under HSN code 251710, subject to CGST @2.5% and SGST @2.5%. The ruling emphasized the separate nature of the transactions, not constituting mixed or composite supply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
