Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed the issue of deduction u/s 80-IC (2) (a) for a company manufacturing Pan Masala. The company's product was considered excluded for deduction due to the Thirteenth Schedule provisions. The Court noted the specific exclusion of tobacco and related products in Part B of the Schedule for certain states. As the company was located in an area specified by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Court found that the product, which did not contain tobacco, was eligible for the deduction. It emphasized that the legislature's omission of Pan Masala in the relevant part of the Schedule precluded its inclusion under the deduction disqualifications. Ultimately, the Court ruled in favor of the company, allowing the deduction u/s 80-IC (2) (a) (i) and Section 80-IC (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The High Court addressed the issue of deduction u/s 80-IC (2) (a) for a company manufacturing Pan Masala. The company's product was considered excluded for deduction due to the Thirteenth Schedule provisions. The Court noted the specific exclusion of tobacco and related products in Part B of the Schedule for certain states. As the company was located in an area specified by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Court found that the product, which did not contain tobacco, was eligible for the deduction. It emphasized that the legislature's omission of Pan Masala in the relevant part of the Schedule precluded its inclusion under the deduction disqualifications. Ultimately, the Court ruled in favor of the company, allowing the deduction u/s 80-IC (2) (a) (i) and Section 80-IC (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
