Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court considered the issue of allowing input tax credit on furnace oil on a proportionate basis or directing the respondent-assessee to pay 8% on the total value of exempted supply as per Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal's previous order was set aside, and the matter was remanded back for fresh consideration in light of a Supreme Court decision. Both parties agreed for the remand. The Tribunal was requested to expedite the disposal of the appeal, preferably by October 30, 2024, after giving both parties a hearing. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court considered the issue of allowing input tax credit on furnace oil on a proportionate basis or directing the respondent-assessee to pay 8% on the total value of exempted supply as per Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal's previous order was set aside, and the matter was remanded back for fresh consideration in light of a Supreme Court decision. Both parties agreed for the remand. The Tribunal was requested to expedite the disposal of the appeal, preferably by October 30, 2024, after giving both parties a hearing. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.