Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
In a case concerning the levy of GST on Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA), the High Court held that the petitioner failed to provide a reasonable explanation for not submitting a written explanation or seeking a personal hearing in response to a show-cause notice issued by the tax authority. The Court emphasized that the petitioner had the opportunity to explain the reasons for not complying with the notice before challenging it in court. As the petitioner did not avail this opportunity, the Court dismissed the petition, ruling it as not maintainable.
In a case concerning the levy of GST on Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA), the High Court held that the petitioner failed to provide a reasonable explanation for not submitting a written explanation or seeking a personal hearing in response to a show-cause notice issued by the tax authority. The Court emphasized that the petitioner had the opportunity to explain the reasons for not complying with the notice before challenging it in court. As the petitioner did not avail this opportunity, the Court dismissed the petition, ruling it as not maintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
