Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4789
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 95769 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court reviewed the validity of an assessment where only one day was given to respond to a show cause notice, deeming it unreasonable and a violation of natural justice. The petitioner submitted evidence from a bank stating a lesser amount received than assessed. Consequently, the court set aside the order and remanded for reconsideration, noting the failure to consider the evidence. The court allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the assessment order unsustainable.
The High Court reviewed the validity of an assessment where only one day was given to respond to a show cause notice, deeming it unreasonable and a violation of natural justice. The petitioner submitted evidence from a bank stating a lesser amount received than assessed. Consequently, the court set aside the order and remanded for reconsideration, noting the failure to consider the evidence. The court allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the assessment order unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4789
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
