Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The High Court reviewed the validity of an assessment where only one day was given to respond to a show cause notice, deeming it unreasonable and a violation of natural justice. The petitioner submitted evidence from a bank stating a lesser amount received than assessed. Consequently, the court set aside the order and remanded for reconsideration, noting the failure to consider the evidence. The court allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the assessment order unsustainable.
The High Court reviewed the validity of an assessment where only one day was given to respond to a show cause notice, deeming it unreasonable and a violation of natural justice. The petitioner submitted evidence from a bank stating a lesser amount received than assessed. Consequently, the court set aside the order and remanded for reconsideration, noting the failure to consider the evidence. The court allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the assessment order unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.