Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
The ITAT considered a case involving denial of exemption u/s 10(38) for alleged bogus LTCG. The assessee invested in shares of a company deemed unreliable due to manipulation by brokers for undue benefits. The ITAT emphasized that profit magnitude does not establish the genuineness of an investee company. Despite the assessee's small profit, it was held that the transaction's genuineness cannot be determined solely by profit amount. The ITAT upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeals), dismissing the assessee's appeal based on the lack of error in the earlier order.
The ITAT considered a case involving denial of exemption u/s 10(38) for alleged bogus LTCG. The assessee invested in shares of a company deemed unreliable due to manipulation by brokers for undue benefits. The ITAT emphasized that profit magnitude does not establish the genuineness of an investee company. Despite the assessee's small profit, it was held that the transaction's genuineness cannot be determined solely by profit amount. The ITAT upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeals), dismissing the assessee's appeal based on the lack of error in the earlier order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
