Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ---- ❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ---- ❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
☰   Show Results ❯
    Outsourced hospital food supply remains taxable, while unproven suppression requires ordinary demand proceedings and tax-inclusive valuation.
    Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
    Inverted duty refunds remain available where higher-taxed processing inputs create credit accumulation without any reduction in output GST rates.
    GST registration revocation requires payment of return-related interest, late fees and penalties beyond outstanding tax.
    GST detention penalties require a specific statutory charge, disclosed evidence, and a meaningful hearing before penalties can stand.
    Local authority status under GST excludes statutory bodies outside enumerated categories, limiting Kerala Water Authority's works-contract concession.
    Refund of excess IGST on exports cannot be denied for a clerical GSTR-3B reporting error.
    E-Way Bill consignment value excludes principal's goods on job-work returns, limiting detention where transport documents are present.
    Mandatory detention-penalty timelines invalidate orders issued after the statutory seven-day period and undermine appellate affirmations.
    Inverted duty refunds cover distinct manufacturing inputs, while administrative clarifications on identical goods do not bar eligible claims.
    Administrative Circulars Cannot Expand Export Incentive Income for Section 80HHC Deduction on Export Quota Premium
    Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
    Book-entry conversion of compulsorily convertible debentures cannot create unexplained cash credit, eliminating related share-premium and non-reportin...
    Undisclosed Income Penalty Requires Search-Based Proof, Not Merely Surrendered Diary Advances, Preventing Automatic Sanctions in Searches
    Post-search reassessment jurisdiction requires a section 148 notice; scrutiny selection and later approval cannot validate an invalid assessment.
    Agricultural Receipts Must Be Assessed Net of Cultivation Costs When Evidence Supports Genuine Farming Operations
    Section 270A penalty cannot rest on a cess deduction claim withdrawn after retrospective amendment during assessment.
    Abatement of pending assessments after search renders a subsequent regular scrutiny assessment without jurisdiction and non-est.
    Final benami adjudication bars contradictory tax-evasion prosecution where settlement findings confirm full disclosure and cooperation without conceal...
    Trade-remedial duty recovery survives levy expiry, but valid authorisations, product proof, and limitation restrict customs demands.
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

The case involved a dispute regarding the entitlement to a...

Dispute Over Service Tax Penalty Reduction: Tribunal Rules 25% Penalty Inapplicable; 50% Reduction Granted for Record-Keeping.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Service Tax June 27, 2024 Case Laws AT
The case involved a dispute regarding the entitlement to a reduced penalty under the second proviso to Section 78(1) of the Finance Act 1994. The appellant had not obtained service tax registration or paid the applicable tax. The Tribunal held that the 25% penalty was not applicable as the appellant did not pay the determined amount and interest within the specified timeframe. However, the appellant was granted the benefit of the first proviso, reducing the penalty to 50% for a specific period. The Commissioner (Appeals) noted the appellant's maintenance of records and transactions, making them eligible for the reduced penalty. The appellant was directed to calculate the total penalty liability and submit proof of payment to the authority. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.

Topics

Acts Income Tax