Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal ruled on Transfer Pricing Adjustment, excluding companies with high turnover from comparables. Companies like Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd., Tata Elxsi Ltd., Persistent Systems Ltd., Aspire Systems Pvt. Ltd., and Infosys Ltd. were deemed incomparable due to substantial turnover difference. Infobeans Technologies Ltd. and Thirdware Solution Ltd. were considered comparable. Cigniti Technologies Ltd. was excluded for not meeting export revenue filter. Certain companies requested for inclusion were remanded for further assessment. Regarding interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal considered it an international transaction, benchmarking at 6% SBI rate due to lack of evidence on extended credit period. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
The Appellate Tribunal ruled on Transfer Pricing Adjustment, excluding companies with high turnover from comparables. Companies like Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd., Tata Elxsi Ltd., Persistent Systems Ltd., Aspire Systems Pvt. Ltd., and Infosys Ltd. were deemed incomparable due to substantial turnover difference. Infobeans Technologies Ltd. and Thirdware Solution Ltd. were considered comparable. Cigniti Technologies Ltd. was excluded for not meeting export revenue filter. Certain companies requested for inclusion were remanded for further assessment. Regarding interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal considered it an international transaction, benchmarking at 6% SBI rate due to lack of evidence on extended credit period. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.