Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The Appellate Tribunal ruled on Transfer Pricing Adjustment, excluding companies with high turnover from comparables. Companies like Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd., Tata Elxsi Ltd., Persistent Systems Ltd., Aspire Systems Pvt. Ltd., and Infosys Ltd. were deemed incomparable due to substantial turnover difference. Infobeans Technologies Ltd. and Thirdware Solution Ltd. were considered comparable. Cigniti Technologies Ltd. was excluded for not meeting export revenue filter. Certain companies requested for inclusion were remanded for further assessment. Regarding interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal considered it an international transaction, benchmarking at 6% SBI rate due to lack of evidence on extended credit period. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
The Appellate Tribunal ruled on Transfer Pricing Adjustment, excluding companies with high turnover from comparables. Companies like Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd., Tata Elxsi Ltd., Persistent Systems Ltd., Aspire Systems Pvt. Ltd., and Infosys Ltd. were deemed incomparable due to substantial turnover difference. Infobeans Technologies Ltd. and Thirdware Solution Ltd. were considered comparable. Cigniti Technologies Ltd. was excluded for not meeting export revenue filter. Certain companies requested for inclusion were remanded for further assessment. Regarding interest on trade receivables, the Tribunal considered it an international transaction, benchmarking at 6% SBI rate due to lack of evidence on extended credit period. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
