Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Scientific research association approval requires continuing SIRO status, annual donation reporting, and donor certificates for the approved foundatio...
Scientific research institution approval is conditional on SIRO recognition, annual donation reporting, donor certification, and prescribed compliance...
Page of 4878
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97553 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. It directed the AO to delete the disallowance of consequential depreciation on unverified expenses and remit the issue of depreciation on unverified purchases for fresh examination. The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill due to the timing of amalgamation and lack of factual examination. The adjustment on a letter of comfort was deleted as it was not considered a guarantee. An additional ground on deduction u/s 10AA was remitted back to the AO. The Tribunal restored the issue of mark to market loss for further examination. ESOP expenses were allowed, and weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) upheld. Pre-commencement expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. It directed the AO to delete the disallowance of consequential depreciation on unverified expenses and remit the issue of depreciation on unverified purchases for fresh examination. The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill due to the timing of amalgamation and lack of factual examination. The adjustment on a letter of comfort was deleted as it was not considered a guarantee. An additional ground on deduction u/s 10AA was remitted back to the AO. The Tribunal restored the issue of mark to market loss for further examination. ESOP expenses were allowed, and weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) upheld. Pre-commencement expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4878 
