Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. It directed the AO to delete the disallowance of consequential depreciation on unverified expenses and remit the issue of depreciation on unverified purchases for fresh examination. The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill due to the timing of amalgamation and lack of factual examination. The adjustment on a letter of comfort was deleted as it was not considered a guarantee. An additional ground on deduction u/s 10AA was remitted back to the AO. The Tribunal restored the issue of mark to market loss for further examination. ESOP expenses were allowed, and weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) upheld. Pre-commencement expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. It directed the AO to delete the disallowance of consequential depreciation on unverified expenses and remit the issue of depreciation on unverified purchases for fresh examination. The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill due to the timing of amalgamation and lack of factual examination. The adjustment on a letter of comfort was deleted as it was not considered a guarantee. An additional ground on deduction u/s 10AA was remitted back to the AO. The Tribunal restored the issue of mark to market loss for further examination. ESOP expenses were allowed, and weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) upheld. Pre-commencement expenses were allowed as revenue expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
