Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
The Supreme Court analyzed the applicability of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 to a Corporation and its employees' Union. The Court determined that the Corporation qualifies as an industrial establishment if its activities aim at monetary gain, excluding construction-related work. Employees who have served for 480 days or more in 24 months are eligible for permanent status. The Court criticized the High Court for suggesting an industrial dispute despite the Inspector of Labour's order favoring the Union members. The appeal by the Corporation was dismissed, affirming the Act's application to the parties involved.
The Supreme Court analyzed the applicability of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 to a Corporation and its employees' Union. The Court determined that the Corporation qualifies as an industrial establishment if its activities aim at monetary gain, excluding construction-related work. Employees who have served for 480 days or more in 24 months are eligible for permanent status. The Court criticized the High Court for suggesting an industrial dispute despite the Inspector of Labour's order favoring the Union members. The appeal by the Corporation was dismissed, affirming the Act's application to the parties involved.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
