Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a case before the High Court, the petitioner sought recovery of CGST, SGST, and KFC amounts following a search and seizure at their business premises. The petitioner claimed they were not provided with the demanded documents, hindering their ability to respond to the show cause notice. The Court noted the lack of a reply from the petitioner and ordered the respondents to supply the required documents within three days. The petitioner was granted 10 days to file a reply, ultimately leading to the disposal of the writ petition. The Court's decision emphasized upholding principles of natural justice in the proceedings.
In a case before the High Court, the petitioner sought recovery of CGST, SGST, and KFC amounts following a search and seizure at their business premises. The petitioner claimed they were not provided with the demanded documents, hindering their ability to respond to the show cause notice. The Court noted the lack of a reply from the petitioner and ordered the respondents to supply the required documents within three days. The petitioner was granted 10 days to file a reply, ultimately leading to the disposal of the writ petition. The Court's decision emphasized upholding principles of natural justice in the proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
