Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of TDS u/s 195 on sub contract charges paid to a Singapore company. The Non-Resident company argued it falls under Section 44BB, exempting it from TDS. The Tribunal found the company covered by Section 44BB and the Singapore company has no Permanent Establishment in India, making the payments non-taxable. Consequently, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) was not applicable. The addition by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of TDS u/s 195 on sub contract charges paid to a Singapore company. The Non-Resident company argued it falls under Section 44BB, exempting it from TDS. The Tribunal found the company covered by Section 44BB and the Singapore company has no Permanent Establishment in India, making the payments non-taxable. Consequently, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) was not applicable. The addition by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
