Judicial discipline requires consistent reassessment treatment where identical facts were decided for the same taxpayer in the preceding assessment ye...
Agreement-date stamp valuation requires the same registered property, fixed consideration, and qualifying payment; an unrelated prior booking cannot a...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of TDS u/s 195 on sub contract charges paid to a Singapore company. The Non-Resident company argued it falls under Section 44BB, exempting it from TDS. The Tribunal found the company covered by Section 44BB and the Singapore company has no Permanent Establishment in India, making the payments non-taxable. Consequently, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) was not applicable. The addition by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of TDS u/s 195 on sub contract charges paid to a Singapore company. The Non-Resident company argued it falls under Section 44BB, exempting it from TDS. The Tribunal found the company covered by Section 44BB and the Singapore company has no Permanent Establishment in India, making the payments non-taxable. Consequently, the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) was not applicable. The addition by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
