Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
201 to 220 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271B for failure to maintain and audit books of accounts under section 44AB. The assessee did not maintain books of account, leading to a violation of section 44AA. The penalty under section 271B was imposed for non-submission of books, despite the assessee not having any to produce. The Tribunal found the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer to be erroneous, directing its deletion. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271B for failure to maintain and audit books of accounts under section 44AB. The assessee did not maintain books of account, leading to a violation of section 44AA. The penalty under section 271B was imposed for non-submission of books, despite the assessee not having any to produce. The Tribunal found the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer to be erroneous, directing its deletion. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.