Residual food-preparation classification places fermented Nata De Coco outside fruit-jelly categories, changing its GST treatment across notified peri...
Settlement application eligibility requires a pending assessment when filed, preventing an extra prior-eligibility condition from blocking considerati...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed several issues. Regarding quantification of profit element on unsubstantiated purchases, the matter was sent back to the Assessing Officer (\u/s) for limited addition based on profit rate variance. Disallowance of interest on loan was allowed for further evidence consideration. Addition \u/s 68 for unsecured loans was revisited due to new documents submitted, leading to a direction for reassessment by the AO. The assessee's appeals were allowed for statistical purposes. The AO was instructed to provide a fair opportunity for the assessee in each case.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed several issues. Regarding quantification of profit element on unsubstantiated purchases, the matter was sent back to the Assessing Officer (\u/s) for limited addition based on profit rate variance. Disallowance of interest on loan was allowed for further evidence consideration. Addition \u/s 68 for unsecured loans was revisited due to new documents submitted, leading to a direction for reassessment by the AO. The assessee's appeals were allowed for statistical purposes. The AO was instructed to provide a fair opportunity for the assessee in each case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.