Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the issue of deemed sale u/s 2(40) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005, upholding the assessment by the Assistant Commissioner. The net turnover calculation u/s Rule 15(2) allows deductions for specified amounts. Citing M/S. K.P. MOZIKA case, the Supreme Court clarified that providing vehicles for transport doesn't constitute transfer of right to use goods. Referring to STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH case, it emphasized that contracts not involving transfer of right to use goods aren't subject to VAT. The Tribunal erred in treating transactions as deemed sale. Therefore, deduction for driver's salary, cleaner, and fuel costs is not applicable, as the transaction wasn't taxable. Revision was allowed.
The High Court considered the issue of deemed sale u/s 2(40) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005, upholding the assessment by the Assistant Commissioner. The net turnover calculation u/s Rule 15(2) allows deductions for specified amounts. Citing M/S. K.P. MOZIKA case, the Supreme Court clarified that providing vehicles for transport doesn't constitute transfer of right to use goods. Referring to STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH case, it emphasized that contracts not involving transfer of right to use goods aren't subject to VAT. The Tribunal erred in treating transactions as deemed sale. Therefore, deduction for driver's salary, cleaner, and fuel costs is not applicable, as the transaction wasn't taxable. Revision was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
