Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Page of 4787
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95724 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the issue of deemed sale u/s 2(40) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005, upholding the assessment by the Assistant Commissioner. The net turnover calculation u/s Rule 15(2) allows deductions for specified amounts. Citing M/S. K.P. MOZIKA case, the Supreme Court clarified that providing vehicles for transport doesn't constitute transfer of right to use goods. Referring to STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH case, it emphasized that contracts not involving transfer of right to use goods aren't subject to VAT. The Tribunal erred in treating transactions as deemed sale. Therefore, deduction for driver's salary, cleaner, and fuel costs is not applicable, as the transaction wasn't taxable. Revision was allowed.
The High Court considered the issue of deemed sale u/s 2(40) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005, upholding the assessment by the Assistant Commissioner. The net turnover calculation u/s Rule 15(2) allows deductions for specified amounts. Citing M/S. K.P. MOZIKA case, the Supreme Court clarified that providing vehicles for transport doesn't constitute transfer of right to use goods. Referring to STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH case, it emphasized that contracts not involving transfer of right to use goods aren't subject to VAT. The Tribunal erred in treating transactions as deemed sale. Therefore, deduction for driver's salary, cleaner, and fuel costs is not applicable, as the transaction wasn't taxable. Revision was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4787
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
