Supervisory permanent establishment requires project-wise duration and qualifying construction nexus; offshore supplies and salary reimbursements rema...
Transfer-pricing comparability permits fresh objections and filters where software service comparables are functionally unsuitable for arm's-length pr...
Territorial rendering requirement excludes China-based management and consultancy services from fees for technical services under the India-China DTAA...
The High Court considered the validity of an adjudication order regarding discrepancies in Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The Court noted the discrepancy and referenced Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST applicable to the financial year 2017-18. The Court found the Circular relevant to the case and set aside the adjudication order. The Court left open the possibility of the Circular's applicability depending on the case's facts. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, granting the petitioner another opportunity to present their case before the Authority. The petition was disposed of by remand.
The High Court considered the validity of an adjudication order regarding discrepancies in Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The Court noted the discrepancy and referenced Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST applicable to the financial year 2017-18. The Court found the Circular relevant to the case and set aside the adjudication order. The Court left open the possibility of the Circular's applicability depending on the case's facts. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, granting the petitioner another opportunity to present their case before the Authority. The petition was disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4879 
