Independent manufacturing undertaking eligibility preserves Section 80IA/80IB deductions, while machinery kept ready for use qualifies for depreciatio...
Assessing Officer Satisfaction Requirement Bars Penalty for Cash Receipt in Immovable-Property Sale Cases Where Initiation Lacks Recorded Satisfaction...
Self-assessed import entries remain appealable, while bona fide classification disputes without misdeclaration cannot justify confiscation or penaltie...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the validity of an adjudication order regarding discrepancies in Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The Court noted the discrepancy and referenced Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST applicable to the financial year 2017-18. The Court found the Circular relevant to the case and set aside the adjudication order. The Court left open the possibility of the Circular's applicability depending on the case's facts. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, granting the petitioner another opportunity to present their case before the Authority. The petition was disposed of by remand.
The High Court considered the validity of an adjudication order regarding discrepancies in Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The Court noted the discrepancy and referenced Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST applicable to the financial year 2017-18. The Court found the Circular relevant to the case and set aside the adjudication order. The Court left open the possibility of the Circular's applicability depending on the case's facts. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, granting the petitioner another opportunity to present their case before the Authority. The petition was disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
