Government water works contract GST concession applied before its withdrawal, while contractual tax reimbursement claims lay outside advance-ruling sc...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 97755 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the validity of an adjudication order regarding discrepancies in Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The Court noted the discrepancy and referenced Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST applicable to the financial year 2017-18. The Court found the Circular relevant to the case and set aside the adjudication order. The Court left open the possibility of the Circular's applicability depending on the case's facts. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, granting the petitioner another opportunity to present their case before the Authority. The petition was disposed of by remand.
The High Court considered the validity of an adjudication order regarding discrepancies in Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. The Court noted the discrepancy and referenced Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST applicable to the financial year 2017-18. The Court found the Circular relevant to the case and set aside the adjudication order. The Court left open the possibility of the Circular's applicability depending on the case's facts. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, granting the petitioner another opportunity to present their case before the Authority. The petition was disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4888 
