Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The case involved the legality of assessment u/s 153A vs. 153C...
ITAT ruled assessment u/s 153A invalid as based on third-party material, required under u/s 153C. No incriminating material found, additions not valid.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The case involved the legality of assessment u/s 153A vs. 153C based on materials found during a search of a third party. It was held that assessment u/s 153A cannot be based on materials found during a third-party search; instead, proceedings must be initiated u/s 153C with proper satisfaction recorded by the assessing officers of both parties. Without this satisfaction, no additions can be made. The High Court ruled that additions based on statements from a third party are impermissible u/s 153A. The assessment was deemed bad-in-law due to these procedural lapses. Regarding the addition of undisclosed income, the CIT(A) found factual discrepancies and lack of corroborative evidence, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.
The case involved the legality of assessment u/s 153A vs. 153C based on materials found during a search of a third party. It was held that assessment u/s 153A cannot be based on materials found during a third-party search; instead, proceedings must be initiated u/s 153C with proper satisfaction recorded by the assessing officers of both parties. Without this satisfaction, no additions can be made. The High Court ruled that additions based on statements from a third party are impermissible u/s 153A. The assessment was deemed bad-in-law due to these procedural lapses. Regarding the addition of undisclosed income, the CIT(A) found factual discrepancies and lack of corroborative evidence, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
