Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
The case involved the legality of assessment u/s 153A vs. 153C...
ITAT ruled assessment u/s 153A invalid as based on third-party material, required under u/s 153C. No incriminating material found, additions not valid.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The case involved the legality of assessment u/s 153A vs. 153C based on materials found during a search of a third party. It was held that assessment u/s 153A cannot be based on materials found during a third-party search; instead, proceedings must be initiated u/s 153C with proper satisfaction recorded by the assessing officers of both parties. Without this satisfaction, no additions can be made. The High Court ruled that additions based on statements from a third party are impermissible u/s 153A. The assessment was deemed bad-in-law due to these procedural lapses. Regarding the addition of undisclosed income, the CIT(A) found factual discrepancies and lack of corroborative evidence, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.
The case involved the legality of assessment u/s 153A vs. 153C based on materials found during a search of a third party. It was held that assessment u/s 153A cannot be based on materials found during a third-party search; instead, proceedings must be initiated u/s 153C with proper satisfaction recorded by the assessing officers of both parties. Without this satisfaction, no additions can be made. The High Court ruled that additions based on statements from a third party are impermissible u/s 153A. The assessment was deemed bad-in-law due to these procedural lapses. Regarding the addition of undisclosed income, the CIT(A) found factual discrepancies and lack of corroborative evidence, leading to the dismissal of the revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
