Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no formal transfer to Gauhati jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the appeal was deemed under improper jurisdiction due to the assessment order's origin in Kolkata. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the Revenue to refile before the appropriate ITAT bench with a delay condonation petition. The time taken for the dismissed appeal may be considered for delay condonation in the refiled appeal.
The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no formal transfer to Gauhati jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the appeal was deemed under improper jurisdiction due to the assessment order's origin in Kolkata. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the Revenue to refile before the appropriate ITAT bench with a delay condonation petition. The time taken for the dismissed appeal may be considered for delay condonation in the refiled appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
