Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no formal transfer to Gauhati jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the appeal was deemed under improper jurisdiction due to the assessment order's origin in Kolkata. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the Revenue to refile before the appropriate ITAT bench with a delay condonation petition. The time taken for the dismissed appeal may be considered for delay condonation in the refiled appeal.
The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no formal transfer to Gauhati jurisdiction. Referring to legal precedents, the appeal was deemed under improper jurisdiction due to the assessment order's origin in Kolkata. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the Revenue to refile before the appropriate ITAT bench with a delay condonation petition. The time taken for the dismissed appeal may be considered for delay condonation in the refiled appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
