Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the disallowance of benefit u/s 90/90A for foreign tax paid in Bhutan due to Form No. 67 not filed within time frame. Relying on legal precedents, including Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy, it held that failure to file Form No. 67 timely does not bar claiming foreign tax credit. The assessee's claim was allowed as Form No. 67 was filed with the return u/s 139(4). The Assessing Officer was directed to grant foreign tax credit as per law and India-Bhutan DTAA u/s 90. The appeal of the assessee was upheld.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the disallowance of benefit u/s 90/90A for foreign tax paid in Bhutan due to Form No. 67 not filed within time frame. Relying on legal precedents, including Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy, it held that failure to file Form No. 67 timely does not bar claiming foreign tax credit. The assessee's claim was allowed as Form No. 67 was filed with the return u/s 139(4). The Assessing Officer was directed to grant foreign tax credit as per law and India-Bhutan DTAA u/s 90. The appeal of the assessee was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
