Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT addressed two main issues: 1. TP Adjustment for...
ITAT says corporate guarantee to AE is not a financial service by assessee. No profit shifting or burden. Interest adjustment on AEs' receivables unjustified.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT addressed two main issues: 1. TP Adjustment for corporate guarantee to AE: As the assessee did not provide guarantees to unrelated parties, it was not a financial service. The low profit rate of AE and adequate security indicated no profit shifting. Citing PCIT Vs Redington, the adjustment was deleted as it did not affect the assessee's finances. 2. Addition of interest on overdue receivables from AEs: TPO applied a 60-day credit policy, contrary to the assessee's 180-day policy in line with RBI guidelines. Following GSS Infotech Ltd, interest was not charged to AEs or non-AEs, so adding notional interest was unjustified. Referring to CIT Vs Indo American Jewellery Ltd, the interest adjustment was deleted.
The ITAT addressed two main issues: 1. TP Adjustment for corporate guarantee to AE: As the assessee did not provide guarantees to unrelated parties, it was not a financial service. The low profit rate of AE and adequate security indicated no profit shifting. Citing PCIT Vs Redington, the adjustment was deleted as it did not affect the assessee's finances. 2. Addition of interest on overdue receivables from AEs: TPO applied a 60-day credit policy, contrary to the assessee's 180-day policy in line with RBI guidelines. Following GSS Infotech Ltd, interest was not charged to AEs or non-AEs, so adding notional interest was unjustified. Referring to CIT Vs Indo American Jewellery Ltd, the interest adjustment was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
