Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of determining income from futures transactions. The Tribunal held that the AO's addition lacked transparency as no information on the alleged transaction was shared. The CIT(A) accepted the turnover disclosed by the assessee but unreasonably applied a 50% profit rate. Given the acceptance of turnover and the assessee's choice of presumptive taxation u/s 44AD, the statutory 8% profit rate should apply. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of determining income from futures transactions. The Tribunal held that the AO's addition lacked transparency as no information on the alleged transaction was shared. The CIT(A) accepted the turnover disclosed by the assessee but unreasonably applied a 50% profit rate. Given the acceptance of turnover and the assessee's choice of presumptive taxation u/s 44AD, the statutory 8% profit rate should apply. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
