Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed a case where Budgetary support was claimed by Bagheri Unit, not Baga Unit. The court found that the petitioner's plea for full budgetary support for Bagheri Unit was not considered. Orders by the 4th respondent and Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside. The matter was remitted back to the 4th respondent for fresh decision after providing a personal hearing. The 4th respondent's failure to give a personal hearing and provide reasons for rejecting a portion of the claim led to setting aside of the Order-in-Original. The case was remanded back for reconsideration of the claim for budgetary support for the 3rd quarter. The petition was disposed of through remand.
The High Court addressed a case where Budgetary support was claimed by Bagheri Unit, not Baga Unit. The court found that the petitioner's plea for full budgetary support for Bagheri Unit was not considered. Orders by the 4th respondent and Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside. The matter was remitted back to the 4th respondent for fresh decision after providing a personal hearing. The 4th respondent's failure to give a personal hearing and provide reasons for rejecting a portion of the claim led to setting aside of the Order-in-Original. The case was remanded back for reconsideration of the claim for budgetary support for the 3rd quarter. The petition was disposed of through remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
