Supervisory permanent establishment requires project-wise duration and qualifying construction nexus; offshore supplies and salary reimbursements rema...
Transfer-pricing comparability permits fresh objections and filters where software service comparables are functionally unsuitable for arm's-length pr...
Territorial rendering requirement excludes China-based management and consultancy services from fees for technical services under the India-China DTAA...
The High Court ruled on the cancellation of GST registration due to non-functional business premises. The court found violations of Rule 25 of CGST Rules as physical verification was not done in the presence of concerned persons. The State Tax Officer had admitted the existence of the petitioner's unit prior to issuing a show cause notice for cancellation. The petitioner had informed about changing the principal place of business, which was acknowledged. The court directed restoration of GST registration retroactively from 20.09.2022, allowing filing of annual returns with late fees. Petition disposed off.
The High Court ruled on the cancellation of GST registration due to non-functional business premises. The court found violations of Rule 25 of CGST Rules as physical verification was not done in the presence of concerned persons. The State Tax Officer had admitted the existence of the petitioner's unit prior to issuing a show cause notice for cancellation. The petitioner had informed about changing the principal place of business, which was acknowledged. The court directed restoration of GST registration retroactively from 20.09.2022, allowing filing of annual returns with late fees. Petition disposed off.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4879 
