Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner lacked access to the GST portal and was unfamiliar with computer resources. The Court noted the cancellation of registration and that the petitioner was not heard despite being offered a personal hearing. The petitioner agreed to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand for a remand. The Court quashed the assessment order, allowing the petitioner to contest the tax demand. The petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner lacked access to the GST portal and was unfamiliar with computer resources. The Court noted the cancellation of registration and that the petitioner was not heard despite being offered a personal hearing. The petitioner agreed to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand for a remand. The Court quashed the assessment order, allowing the petitioner to contest the tax demand. The petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
