Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner lacked access to the GST portal and was unfamiliar with computer resources. The Court noted the cancellation of registration and that the petitioner was not heard despite being offered a personal hearing. The petitioner agreed to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand for a remand. The Court quashed the assessment order, allowing the petitioner to contest the tax demand. The petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner lacked access to the GST portal and was unfamiliar with computer resources. The Court noted the cancellation of registration and that the petitioner was not heard despite being offered a personal hearing. The petitioner agreed to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand for a remand. The Court quashed the assessment order, allowing the petitioner to contest the tax demand. The petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
