Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Scientific research association approval requires continuing SIRO status, annual donation reporting, and donor certificates for the approved foundatio...
Scientific research institution approval is conditional on SIRO recognition, annual donation reporting, donor certification, and prescribed compliance...
Page of 4878
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97553 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court allowed the petition seeking revocation of registration cancellation u/s 30 of the GST Act. The Court recognized the serious consequences of cancellation on the petitioner's business and emphasized the Act's objective of tax collection. The petitioner was permitted to apply u/s 30 upon payment of Rs. 6,19,258.85 and other penalties. The payment of interest was without prejudice to the petitioner's rights, allowing challenge within 30 days. The decision reflects a liberal approach towards defaulters to enable businesses to continue operations.
The High Court allowed the petition seeking revocation of registration cancellation u/s 30 of the GST Act. The Court recognized the serious consequences of cancellation on the petitioner's business and emphasized the Act's objective of tax collection. The petitioner was permitted to apply u/s 30 upon payment of Rs. 6,19,258.85 and other penalties. The payment of interest was without prejudice to the petitioner's rights, allowing challenge within 30 days. The decision reflects a liberal approach towards defaulters to enable businesses to continue operations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.