Supervisory permanent establishment requires project-wise duration and qualifying construction nexus; offshore supplies and salary reimbursements rema...
Transfer-pricing comparability permits fresh objections and filters where software service comparables are functionally unsuitable for arm's-length pr...
Page of 4893
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 97852 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal considered the disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80-IA due to the assessee's failure to file Form no.10CCB on time. The Tribunal found that the audit report was filed online by the assessee, albeit with a delay. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities' decision, citing that the Supreme Court's ruling in Wipro Ltd. did not support the Revenue's case. The Tribunal noted that the amendment to section 80-IA(7) by the Finance Act, 2020, was not applicable to the assessment year in question. As the audit report was filed within the allowed time, the disallowance of the deduction u/s 80-IA was overturned, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 80-IA due to the assessee's failure to file Form no.10CCB on time. The Tribunal found that the audit report was filed online by the assessee, albeit with a delay. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities' decision, citing that the Supreme Court's ruling in Wipro Ltd. did not support the Revenue's case. The Tribunal noted that the amendment to section 80-IA(7) by the Finance Act, 2020, was not applicable to the assessment year in question. As the audit report was filed within the allowed time, the disallowance of the deduction u/s 80-IA was overturned, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4893 
