Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
The Appellate Tribunal considered TP adjustment on brokerage commission received from related parties. It found TNMM method appropriate for benchmarking the commission rates. Also, it held that higher commission rates for non-related parties should be arm's length for related parties. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding TNMM as the preferred method. Regarding royalty payments, the Tribunal upheld TNMM method for benchmarking, rejecting internal CUP and external CUP due to lack of comparable data. Indirect cost reimbursement was scrutinized, with the Tribunal directing deletion of the addition made by AO/TPO. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee for outstanding securities tax and TDS issues, directing deletions of disallowances. The Tribunal allowed the appeal on various grounds, maintaining consistency with prior rulings.
The Appellate Tribunal considered TP adjustment on brokerage commission received from related parties. It found TNMM method appropriate for benchmarking the commission rates. Also, it held that higher commission rates for non-related parties should be arm's length for related parties. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding TNMM as the preferred method. Regarding royalty payments, the Tribunal upheld TNMM method for benchmarking, rejecting internal CUP and external CUP due to lack of comparable data. Indirect cost reimbursement was scrutinized, with the Tribunal directing deletion of the addition made by AO/TPO. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee for outstanding securities tax and TDS issues, directing deletions of disallowances. The Tribunal allowed the appeal on various grounds, maintaining consistency with prior rulings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
