Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed a valuation issue concerning TDS deposited with the Income Tax Department related to payments to foreign service providers under reverse charge. Referring to a previous decision, it was established that the appellant is responsible for bearing the TDS as per the agreement terms. The TDS amount is not part of the value of services received, on which service tax under reverse charge is applicable. The appeal was allowed, finding no merit in the initial order.
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed a valuation issue concerning TDS deposited with the Income Tax Department related to payments to foreign service providers under reverse charge. Referring to a previous decision, it was established that the appellant is responsible for bearing the TDS as per the agreement terms. The TDS amount is not part of the value of services received, on which service tax under reverse charge is applicable. The appeal was allowed, finding no merit in the initial order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
