Investigation deposits refunded after failed customs demands fall outside the statutory appellate pre-deposit interest regime and may attract compensa...
Resolution plan finality extinguishes unquantified operational-creditor claims and pending proceedings unless the approved plan expressly preserves th...
Stakeholder-list modification permits liquidators to update entries on new information, subject to notifying the Adjudicating Authority within prescri...
In a case involving dishonour of a cheque u/s 138 of the NI Act, accused sought to give evidence through affidavit u/s 145. High Court held that accused cannot do so, following SC decisions in similar cases. Emphasized expeditious trial completion. Refused to reconsider stance. Directed trial court to hasten proceedings as accused's evidence pending. Petition dismissed. Relevant cases: Mandvi Cooperative Bank, Indian Bank Association, SBI Global Factors Limited, Nitin v. Prakashrao.
In a case involving dishonour of a cheque u/s 138 of the NI Act, accused sought to give evidence through affidavit u/s 145. High Court held that accused cannot do so, following SC decisions in similar cases. Emphasized expeditious trial completion. Refused to reconsider stance. Directed trial court to hasten proceedings as accused's evidence pending. Petition dismissed. Relevant cases: Mandvi Cooperative Bank, Indian Bank Association, SBI Global Factors Limited, Nitin v. Prakashrao.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
