Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
In a case involving dishonour of a cheque u/s 138 of the NI Act, accused sought to give evidence through affidavit u/s 145. High Court held that accused cannot do so, following SC decisions in similar cases. Emphasized expeditious trial completion. Refused to reconsider stance. Directed trial court to hasten proceedings as accused's evidence pending. Petition dismissed. Relevant cases: Mandvi Cooperative Bank, Indian Bank Association, SBI Global Factors Limited, Nitin v. Prakashrao.
In a case involving dishonour of a cheque u/s 138 of the NI Act, accused sought to give evidence through affidavit u/s 145. High Court held that accused cannot do so, following SC decisions in similar cases. Emphasized expeditious trial completion. Refused to reconsider stance. Directed trial court to hasten proceedings as accused's evidence pending. Petition dismissed. Relevant cases: Mandvi Cooperative Bank, Indian Bank Association, SBI Global Factors Limited, Nitin v. Prakashrao.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.