Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns. The petitioner did not respond to a show cause notice. The court found that the petitioner relied on a notification for GST exemption. The impugned orders were set aside with a condition for the petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demands within two weeks, after crediting a specific amount already paid. The writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demands on merits.
The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns. The petitioner did not respond to a show cause notice. The court found that the petitioner relied on a notification for GST exemption. The impugned orders were set aside with a condition for the petitioner to remit 10% of disputed tax demands within two weeks, after crediting a specific amount already paid. The writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demands on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
