COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis. Discrepancy in GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A noted. Court found tax proposal confirmed as petitioner didn't respond or attend hearing. Court held justice requires giving petitioner chance, so remand ordered with condition to remit 10% of disputed tax demand within two weeks. Impugned order set aside, matter remanded for reconsideration, and petition disposed of.
In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis. Discrepancy in GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated GSTR 2A noted. Court found tax proposal confirmed as petitioner didn't respond or attend hearing. Court held justice requires giving petitioner chance, so remand ordered with condition to remit 10% of disputed tax demand within two weeks. Impugned order set aside, matter remanded for reconsideration, and petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
