Turnover mismatches under percentage-completion accounting cannot alone establish suppressed income where customer advances remain recorded as liabili...
Territorial jurisdiction for money-laundering trials is revised for specified districts, replacing earlier court-area entries under the statutory fram...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that denial of exemption u/s 11 due to late filing of...
Exemption denied for late form filing, but auditor report filed before notice. Income application claim allowed. No late fee for filing return on time.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT held that denial of exemption u/s 11 due to late filing of form 10B was unjustified as the audit report was submitted before intimation u/s 143(1). Lack of mala fide intent was noted. Fee u/s 234F for delayed filing was deemed inapplicable as the return was filed before the due date u/s 139(1). Thus, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
ITAT held that denial of exemption u/s 11 due to late filing of form 10B was unjustified as the audit report was submitted before intimation u/s 143(1). Lack of mala fide intent was noted. Fee u/s 234F for delayed filing was deemed inapplicable as the return was filed before the due date u/s 139(1). Thus, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.