Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
ITAT held that denial of exemption u/s 11 due to late filing of...
Exemption denied for late form filing, but auditor report filed before notice. Income application claim allowed. No late fee for filing return on time.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
ITAT held that denial of exemption u/s 11 due to late filing of form 10B was unjustified as the audit report was submitted before intimation u/s 143(1). Lack of mala fide intent was noted. Fee u/s 234F for delayed filing was deemed inapplicable as the return was filed before the due date u/s 139(1). Thus, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
ITAT held that denial of exemption u/s 11 due to late filing of form 10B was unjustified as the audit report was submitted before intimation u/s 143(1). Lack of mala fide intent was noted. Fee u/s 234F for delayed filing was deemed inapplicable as the return was filed before the due date u/s 139(1). Thus, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.