Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denial of exemption u/s 11 due to a violation u/s 13(1)(c)(ii) involving an interest-free advance to a 'specified person' u/s 13(3). The assessee had made an advance to Divine Real Build Pvt. Ltd. for a land purchase agreement, intending to increase FAR with DDA. The AO found the land to be agricultural with no construction permission. The AR argued that crucial documents supporting the assessee's intentions were not available earlier. The ITAT allowed admission of these documents for fair adjudication, remitting the issue back to the AO for fresh consideration in both assessment years. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denial of exemption u/s 11 due to a violation u/s 13(1)(c)(ii) involving an interest-free advance to a 'specified person' u/s 13(3). The assessee had made an advance to Divine Real Build Pvt. Ltd. for a land purchase agreement, intending to increase FAR with DDA. The AO found the land to be agricultural with no construction permission. The AR argued that crucial documents supporting the assessee's intentions were not available earlier. The ITAT allowed admission of these documents for fair adjudication, remitting the issue back to the AO for fresh consideration in both assessment years. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
