Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denial of exemption u/s 11 due to a violation u/s 13(1)(c)(ii) involving an interest-free advance to a 'specified person' u/s 13(3). The assessee had made an advance to Divine Real Build Pvt. Ltd. for a land purchase agreement, intending to increase FAR with DDA. The AO found the land to be agricultural with no construction permission. The AR argued that crucial documents supporting the assessee's intentions were not available earlier. The ITAT allowed admission of these documents for fair adjudication, remitting the issue back to the AO for fresh consideration in both assessment years. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of denial of exemption u/s 11 due to a violation u/s 13(1)(c)(ii) involving an interest-free advance to a 'specified person' u/s 13(3). The assessee had made an advance to Divine Real Build Pvt. Ltd. for a land purchase agreement, intending to increase FAR with DDA. The AO found the land to be agricultural with no construction permission. The AR argued that crucial documents supporting the assessee's intentions were not available earlier. The ITAT allowed admission of these documents for fair adjudication, remitting the issue back to the AO for fresh consideration in both assessment years. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
