Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arising from a complaint case. The petitioners were accused of criminal conspiracy to encash cheques by forging bills despite no material being supplied. The Court held that the cheque issued as security in a financial transaction matures for presentation if not repaid as agreed, leading to consequences u/s 138. The Court found the complaint to be malicious prosecution to shortcut civil proceedings, quashing the entire criminal case. The decision was influenced by a Supreme Court judgment emphasizing the legal consequences of dishonored cheques used as security.
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arising from a complaint case. The petitioners were accused of criminal conspiracy to encash cheques by forging bills despite no material being supplied. The Court held that the cheque issued as security in a financial transaction matures for presentation if not repaid as agreed, leading to consequences u/s 138. The Court found the complaint to be malicious prosecution to shortcut civil proceedings, quashing the entire criminal case. The decision was influenced by a Supreme Court judgment emphasizing the legal consequences of dishonored cheques used as security.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
