Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arising from a complaint case. The petitioners were accused of criminal conspiracy to encash cheques by forging bills despite no material being supplied. The Court held that the cheque issued as security in a financial transaction matures for presentation if not repaid as agreed, leading to consequences u/s 138. The Court found the complaint to be malicious prosecution to shortcut civil proceedings, quashing the entire criminal case. The decision was influenced by a Supreme Court judgment emphasizing the legal consequences of dishonored cheques used as security.
The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act arising from a complaint case. The petitioners were accused of criminal conspiracy to encash cheques by forging bills despite no material being supplied. The Court held that the cheque issued as security in a financial transaction matures for presentation if not repaid as agreed, leading to consequences u/s 138. The Court found the complaint to be malicious prosecution to shortcut civil proceedings, quashing the entire criminal case. The decision was influenced by a Supreme Court judgment emphasizing the legal consequences of dishonored cheques used as security.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
